As the British Guardian reported that British environmental groups condemned the British government to access the sovereign rights of the word sea 1 million square kilometers of Antarctica, said the move would be in the region and the global ecosystem to produce incalculable effects damage. The newspaper said in a report 17 that the British Foreign Office is collecting and processing the data and apply immediately to the United Nations for sovereignty over Antarctica. If this application can happen, England will have an area of 350 oil and gas and seabed mineral rights to the minerals out of the Antarctic continental shelf, the floor area of approximately 100 million square kilometers. Because most expensive handbags in the world so strange?
In this sense, the project manager of the World Wildlife Fund marine says, “The Antarctic is an extremely fragile region, and no country should consider oil and gas in this region. Let’s take a look in the directory Free web more expensive during the winter break, “adding that” the marine life of this area had been extinguished because of global warming. Trend Bible must-see for the design of fair use bag launch activities what ruins are in the life of this area.
The man in charge of climate change Greenpeace UK said the government move is “extremely irresponsible, and it is difficult to understand. He said it is surprising that a country’s leaders on the issue of global climate change acted enthusiasticly oil competition. Climate change is causing a huge impact in Antarctica. However, this act of government is insufficient.
Some analysts thought that the goal of England to take over sovereignty in Antarctica was to have the advantage in future competition for energy due to increased competition in energy between the countries. So far, the authorities in Chile and Argentina did not comment on the latest trends on the question of Antarctica British Government.
Moreover, the British government is making some positive efforts to protect the environment, for example, the plan of building green investment bank. British Chancellor of the Treasury, Alistair Darling, has proposed creating a “green investment bank and the government prior to the budget of the relevant part of the proposal.
It was reported that the bank will be devoted to financing low-carbon, green projects and businesses. Industry groups and environmental consulting services Darling. They said they will contribute to investments in renewable energy and sustainable development.
Top of department policies Robin Oakley, Greenpeace shows that the British government needs the bank, based on the above objectives. UK Government has committed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide in large part to ensure that objectives are realized, a large amount of investment is required for development [green technology and low carbon projects. This said Robin Oakley, “green” investment bank will help the UK achieve these objectives.
“E3G” is a non-profit organizations that support for UK companies in developing software compatible with the environment. Organization Nick Mabey, founder of “believes that investors want to invest in low carbon to this bank. Maybee found that the bank should be backed by government funding. When set, the bank will become the only state of Europe, used in green investment.